Home > Commentary
The 'dumbening' of journalism?
In my opinion
by Tyler Graf | Opinion editor
PUBLISHED ON 2/12/07 IN Commentary
|
Larry King eulogized Smith is his patented crazy manner, calling her "not the brightest woman in the world," and comparing her with Marilyn Monroe, presumably because they both had blonde hair and big breasts. A plethora of Associated Press stories were available on Yahoo News, including one headlined "Candle in the Wind." As tactful as it might have seemed to draw parallels between Princess Diana (the most recent recipient of Elton John's insipid eulogizing song), who donated her time to charity and was a symbol of refined class, to a functionally illiterate woman-child who took her clothes off for money and then married a decrepit billionaire and ghoulishly waited for him to die, this was probably not the aptest headline. "Our long national nightmare is over" would have been a more fitting headline.
I'm not saying that Smith was a bad person, or that she did bad things, or that her death is unworthy of sympathy. Death in general is not funny (unless it is the result of autoerotic asphyxiation, which, let's face it, is pretty hilarious). But it's also not terribly newsworthy. While watching Anna Nicole Smith in life - drunkenly ambling from one series of events to another, slurring for the cameras - it became apparent that something was wrong, or as her mother said recently on Good Morning America, "I think she had too many drugs."
Thank you, Dr. Obvious.
Smith remained another American jester, whose addled existence was broadcast into our homes for our amusement and bemusement. Her life was so humorously melodramatic that it resembled a soap opera - from her hardscrabble upbringing, to her modeling career, to her notorious marriage to an aged oil baron, to the recent mysterious death of her son and the paternity tests resulting from the birth of her daughter. The coverage of this death is not, however, a new low for journalism, facilitated by the rise of the Internet and new technologies capable of tracking the readership/viewership of stories, as some commentators have opined. Quasi-journalists have always been fascinated with the private lives of semi-public figures. The William Randolph Hearst newspapers of the 1920s revolutionized it, and his papers usually just made stuff up. There are still awards and scholarships with Hearst's name attached.
Spring Break




Viewing Comments 1 - 1 of 2
dorothy
posted 2/14/07 @ 6:57 PM PST
Right on,Tyler!!Why do you think I read The Emerald?You guys mostly take news seriously.I gave up on main-stream news sources years ago.Phone-ee.Censored-to-death. (Continued…)
Post a Comment