Spring Break
Home > Commentary
Cotton shows bias in saying that cheerleading will draw many fans, revenue for department
Letter to the Editor
PUBLISHED ON 7/30/07 IN Commentary
The Emerald recently printed an opinion piece by Dan Cotton ("Competitive cheer is a good fit for the University despite complaints," ODE, July 25), who was identified as a University alumnus but should have been further identified as a
cheerleader and a cheerleading coach. This information, had it been provided, would have helped to better highlight the bias inherent in Cotton's letter. Cotton asserts that competitive cheerleading should be an NCAA-level competitive team. He also states that the team will draw numerous fans. Surely, Cotton recognizes that even though he enjoys cheerleading, the vast majority of the population treats it solely as an activity that supports other teams, such as basketball and football. On its own, cheerleading is at best a marginal "sport" to the public at large.
The most frustrating aspect of Cotton's opinion piece, however, was his insistence that cheerleading has "the potential to bring in a large amount of revenue for the athletic department." Were this a private business, I would agree this should be a major concern. Unfortunately, this is a public university where academics, not athletics or revenue, should take priority. In dealing with athletics, the University's focus must be on student need, not revenue. The fact is, the University failed and is failing to address the athletic needs of enrolled females. The University could have added a number of widely regarded women's sports. Instead, they chose one that is usually viewed as sexist and anachronistic and which only one other university treats as a sport. This probably wouldn't matter in a revenue-seeking private business. For a public university, however, addressing the needs of female athletes is not just a good idea, it is required by law. Our female athletes deserve better than the University's half-hearted attempt to address a shoddy Title IX history.
Peter Fehrs
University law student
cheerleader and a cheerleading coach. This information, had it been provided, would have helped to better highlight the bias inherent in Cotton's letter. Cotton asserts that competitive cheerleading should be an NCAA-level competitive team. He also states that the team will draw numerous fans. Surely, Cotton recognizes that even though he enjoys cheerleading, the vast majority of the population treats it solely as an activity that supports other teams, such as basketball and football. On its own, cheerleading is at best a marginal "sport" to the public at large.
The most frustrating aspect of Cotton's opinion piece, however, was his insistence that cheerleading has "the potential to bring in a large amount of revenue for the athletic department." Were this a private business, I would agree this should be a major concern. Unfortunately, this is a public university where academics, not athletics or revenue, should take priority. In dealing with athletics, the University's focus must be on student need, not revenue. The fact is, the University failed and is failing to address the athletic needs of enrolled females. The University could have added a number of widely regarded women's sports. Instead, they chose one that is usually viewed as sexist and anachronistic and which only one other university treats as a sport. This probably wouldn't matter in a revenue-seeking private business. For a public university, however, addressing the needs of female athletes is not just a good idea, it is required by law. Our female athletes deserve better than the University's half-hearted attempt to address a shoddy Title IX history.
Peter Fehrs
University law student
Viewing Comments 1 - 2 of 2
Dan
posted 7/30/07 @ 2:29 PM PST
Your right I am a cheerleader and coach. So inherently there is bias in my opinion. I apologize that my article was so frusterating to you. My comment about bringing in revenue for the university was not meant to discredit the advances of womens sports, it was simply an observation that the university athletic department could gain revenue from a team such as this if it was well managed. (Continued…)
Travis
posted 7/30/07 @ 5:08 PM PST
Although I agree that Cotton's affiliation with cheerleading should have been stated, I strongly disagree with the statement that "cheerleading is at best a marginal "sport" to the public at large. (Continued…)
Post a Comment